I would like to remove the text in the user page (allpersons.aspx) next to the magnifying glass it has
"Or click New to create a new user."
I would like to hide this, I see the code when viewing the source, but I am unable to fins it in any pages.
Any help would be useful, since I was unabel to locate it when digging around on cusomtizations to FIM pages.
Thanks
Russ
I'm getting ready for a new FIM build and the customer wants to use the latest and greatest. So what's supported:
Is Windows 2012r2 supported
Sql 2012 sp2
SharePoint Foundations 2013 sp?
Is there an up-to-date doc I can download some place?
Thanks
Hi.
Contractors setup FIM but have left us with an issue which they claim cannot be resolved.
1. A user is created in AD
2. On the first Portal Export a join occurs (presumably this is a returning student and already exists in the Portal)
3. On the next Portal Export an error occurs "
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><AttributeRepresentationFailure><AttributeType>ObjectSID</AttributeType><AttributeValue></AttributeValue><FailureMessage>Exception:
ValueViolatesUniqueness
Stack Trace:
Why does it still try to provision even though there is an existing join? How do I stop this from occurring?
MM
Just to let you guys know. I'm very happy to have released my rules extension framework for FIM2010 R2.
You can read more about it here - https://fimmare.codeplex.com/ or on my blog here http://blog.goverco.com/2015/02/fim-ma-rules-framework-released.html
Thank you...
Regards, Soren Granfeldt
blog is at http://blog.goverco.com | facebook https://www.facebook.com/TheIdentityManagementExplorer | twitter at https://twitter.com/#!/MrGranfeldt
Experts,
We are using FIM 2010 R2 for AD provisioning in our environment which is running completely fine. All provisioning is codeless and through outbound synch rule to AD.
Now we want to enable exchange provisioning. I have been going through couple of links and getting one doubt.
do I have to necessarily select 'Enable Metaverse Rule Extension' and select file 'Exch2010Extenstion.dll' although I am having codeless provisioning so far?
Thanks,
Mann
I've created a lab scenario where I have many CS entries to one MV person. Each CS record has a date range specifying whether the information in that record is current, and a job role. Certain job roles out rank other job roles. So a user may have three job roles: Cleaner, Designer and Manager. Manager outranks Designer, Designer outranks Cleaner.
If I create a user with one record showing them as a Manager and another record showing them as a Cleaner, both with valid dates how can I make it so that the Manager record outranks their Cleaner status, yet if their Manager record expires first, the Cleaner status takes precedence?
I know that to achieve this I could import additional information into the MV or portal, or I could handle the information prior to presenting it to FIM but I am curious to know whether it is possible entirely in rules extensions.
In pseudo code, my process was:
Are CS attributes present?
Is the date range current?
Is the start date newer than the existing start date?
Does the CS-jobrole outrank MV-jobrole?But then I realised if a user has previously been a Manager but is no longer, the job role will remain Manager as this outranks the jobrole CS entry.
Any suggestions? Am I missing something? Thanks.
Has anyone configured auto creation of dynamic groups based on lets say a new dept. created in HR's connected data source. Then have the criteria of that new Dept. be in the new group, all hands off??? Custom workflows in the FIM Portal is what I'm thinking, is that possible???
Thanks
Hi,
Apologies in advanced, I have very basic knowledge of FIM Sync!
I have GALSync nicely configured to sync contacts from Domain A to Domain B. This works perfectly and has helped a lot with our cross forest move.
However I now need to add Domain C into the mix which only needs certain users from Domain A syncing across (these do not need to be in Domain B).
I have tried adding a connector filter on Domain C's Management Agent as "Mail does contains certaindomain.com" however it will still sync all the unwanted contacts from Domain A.
How can I go about this? Will I need to wait for us to finish the migration to domain B and then add the OU's I need?
Any help would be appreciated as I would like to start adding contacts into Domain C
Hi all
We currently have a working single-server installation of FIM (FIMService, FIMSyncService, FIMPortal) and I'm looking ways to expand the installation with reporting features, with SCSM 2012. I was thinking about going with the 2 server configuration.
Thanks all!
Hello,
Can I move the FIMSync DB (MDF) file from ONE Drive to ANOTHER on the same server. Database wise it is possible to move.
I would like to know if this would affect FIM Sync.
Any precautions before doing this ?
hello
i have a csv management agent, i want to manage this case
when an identity is removed from the file , i want to disconnect from the CSV MA and update an attribute on the metaverse ?
is it possible ?
Thanks
hello,
i want to ask about join criteria for the Active Directory management agent
Currently my join criteria is based on samAccountName, and i want to know if it is a good idea to change the join to be based on ObjectSid ?
Regards
Hi
What IIS setting will affect to Fim Portal session time? Can somebody point me to the correct direction?
I have edited also timeoutInMilliseconds without any results from inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\80\web.config
<resourceManagementClient resourceManagementServiceBaseAddress="http://company.domain:5725" timeoutInMilliseconds="60000" />
We've been using multiple outbound sync rules from one MV Object to provision multiple AD Accounts (of different types, with different DNs and AccountNames).
This has suddenly stopped working. We've gone over changes made and found none that should affect the provisioning.
Now, only one user account is provisioned in ADMA. We only get one provisioning-rules on the ADMA.
We use the same Relationship on the two Sync Rules, but different Inbound Scoping.
Any ideas?
hello,
i use an MV extension to provision user from AD to AD LDS, but when i try to populate the objectGUID of the AD LDS Management Agent it does not work
csentry["objectGUID"].BinaryValue = mventry["mv_GUID"].BinaryValue;
mv_GUID is mapped directly with objectGUID of the AD Management Agent
Regards
I have created a user binded Direct reports attribute I want to display in the FIM portal in the user profile.
I am having an issue with populating this attribute. I need assistance on how to complete this... I am a novice on sets and workflows and MPR. I know from research it is a combination of the 3, I just am not sure how to actually populate it.
any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Russell Lema
Is there an easy way to join on the sidhistory attribute?
I'm using ADMT to consolidate forests, and migrating the users with sidhistory.
Both forests are FIM connectors. I'm importing the objectsid from the source forest into the metaverse, and would like to have a join rule that matches any 1 of several sids in the sidhistory attribute of the target forest. Is that possible?
Rob
I have developed a generic SQL ECMA2 agent that can call stored procedures and it uses references, but every object receives a new ID on creation, but sometimes it seems a reference is export as the temporary GUID from the refered object.
I don't want to export the temporary GUID because that means the reffered object is not yet exported, is there any way i can overcome this? i can check in the export method if the reference value equals a guid and throw an error so it will be exported in the next export run or are there other ECMA2 options which i can use?
Need realtime FIM synchronization and advanced reporting? check out the new IM Sequencer 6.0 at http://www.imsequencer.com, it supports FIM 2010 R2, Omada Identity Manager, SQL, File, AD or Powershell real time synchronization!
Hi All,
I am new to FIM and have a query on the release on FIM 2010 R2 SP1 and MIM (Microsoft Identity Manager). I have come across articles saying these will be released in 2015.
Are these both the same or different releases? What are the different features these provide?
